<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Buy It: The Truth About Carbon Offsets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.getsolar.com/blog/dont-buy-it-the-truth-about-carbon-offsets/95/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.getsolar.com/blog/dont-buy-it-the-truth-about-carbon-offsets/95/</link>
	<description>Get the latest news on solar homes, solar panels &#38; renewable energy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:49:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.getsolar.com/blog/dont-buy-it-the-truth-about-carbon-offsets/95/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 13:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getsolar.com/blog/dont-buy-it-the-truth-about-carbon-offsets/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Margaret. While I share your skepticism about the efficacy of carbon offsets, I&#039;m not quite ready to write them off entirely. Are they perfect? Far from it. Are they better than nothing? Maybe. I mean, I&#039;ve never purchased an offset, and likely never will. Like you, I&#039;d prefer to ride my bike or take the T.

At very least, though, offsets may get people in the developed world (like us) to start thinking about pricing carbon into our purchasing behavior. Also, there&#039;s the argument that some offset projects may eventually generate meaningful capital and technology transfer to the emerging/developing world--a process that will be necessary if those countries are to shift to a less-carbon-intensive development path. 

A few months ago, I came across this piece by Michael Wara, a research fellow at Stanford&#039;s Center for Environmental Science and Policy: http://pesd.stanford.edu/publications/cdm/ He definitely paints a dour picture, exposing the shortfalls of offsets--particularly those created by mitigating HFC-23 emissions in China--and calling into question the effectiveness of Kyoto. It&#039;s worth a read.  

Instead of offsets: save and invest what you would give to Terrapass. Then, when you&#039;ve accumulated enough, liquidate your assets and buy PV panels (through Getsolar, of course...).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Margaret. While I share your skepticism about the efficacy of carbon offsets, I&#8217;m not quite ready to write them off entirely. Are they perfect? Far from it. Are they better than nothing? Maybe. I mean, I&#8217;ve never purchased an offset, and likely never will. Like you, I&#8217;d prefer to ride my bike or take the T.</p>
<p>At very least, though, offsets may get people in the developed world (like us) to start thinking about pricing carbon into our purchasing behavior. Also, there&#8217;s the argument that some offset projects may eventually generate meaningful capital and technology transfer to the emerging/developing world&#8211;a process that will be necessary if those countries are to shift to a less-carbon-intensive development path. </p>
<p>A few months ago, I came across this piece by Michael Wara, a research fellow at Stanford&#8217;s Center for Environmental Science and Policy: <a href="http://pesd.stanford.edu/publications/cdm/" rel="nofollow">http://pesd.stanford.edu/publications/cdm/</a> He definitely paints a dour picture, exposing the shortfalls of offsets&#8211;particularly those created by mitigating HFC-23 emissions in China&#8211;and calling into question the effectiveness of Kyoto. It&#8217;s worth a read.  </p>
<p>Instead of offsets: save and invest what you would give to Terrapass. Then, when you&#8217;ve accumulated enough, liquidate your assets and buy PV panels (through Getsolar, of course&#8230;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
